Synthesizer
IPD receivers
With
the introduction of the new RX-5-SYNTH IPD
Unrestricted
channel selection with the Synthesizer
All
RX-5-SYNTH IPD CAR receivers are fitted with a
A
plausibility check is then carried out (the user
Selectable
channels / frequencies*:
35
MHz (A- and B-band):
Ch
55 / 34.950 MHz ... Ch 60 / 35.000 MHz
Ch
61 / 35.010 MHz ... Ch 80 / 35.200 MHz
Ch
81 / 35.210 MHz ... Ch 90 / 35.300 MHz
Ch
182 / 35.820 MHz ... Ch 191 / 35.910 MHz
40/41
MHz:
Ch
41 / 40.575 MHz ... Ch 59 / 40.785 MHz
Ch
81 / 40.815 MHz ... Ch 92 / 40.985 MHz
Ch
400 / 41.000 MHz ... Ch 420 / 41.200 MHz
IPD
- What does it mean?
The
abbreviation IPD stands
for Intelligent
Pulse
The
advantages of IPD technology
1.
Only valid signals “get through”
The
IPD receiver only considers a signal valid if its
2.
Invalid signals are replaced (HOLD MODE)
If
an invalid signal is picked up, the receiver rejects
3.
“Safety setting” (FAIL-SAFE) in the case of total
If
no valid signal is picked up for a particular
4.
IPD is compatible
IPD
works on the basis of the current FM-PPM
5.
IPD monitors reception quality
The
receiver analyses the signal, and adjusts it
Programming
facilities, additional features
The
integral LED and push-button of the RX-SYNTH-IPD
*
Setting FAIL-SAFE positions
*
IPD ON/OFF for range checking
Here is a basic comparison between the current
crop of receivers on the market.
Done by Jason Werner
PPM
Our traditional "FM" is still a
framed signal that the rx processes. The only difference is that
it is an analog based signal. So what happens is that any signal
received within the "frame" for that channel is processed. This is
the famous glitch where the servos are sent screwy for an instant.
The advantages of FM are super high
refresh rates because the data length is very small. Also the resolution
in theory can be very high because there is no loss of signal during the
conversion to digital.
Disadvantages - the "glitch".
This spastic movement of the servos when a bad signal is decoded is why
many people prefer to switch away from traditional PPM. Also the
resolution that many of the older radios had is removed by the new "digital"
txs that use only 512 or 1024 bits of resolution. But to be honest,
that is a minor problem and most people would never see it.
PCM
PCM is still broadcast on the FM
carrier wave. But instead of using a PPM frame setup, a digital stream
is created of x bits (1024 for most). The digital stream consists
of a header, a trailer, a set of parity bits, a failsafe section, and the
actual control section. The receiver takes this stream/word and decodes
it into the control positions based on the position in the stream.
Since a small microcomputer is in the Rx, quite a bit of processing can
be done during this section.
Advantages - no more glitch!
While the same bad data is received by the RX, the microcomputer has the
smarts to reject that bad data and not move the servos. So for that
instant you simply don't get movement of the servos. For 99%
of the people out there, this is the only reason they switch to PCM!
Another advantage is better control of certain surfaces. On PPM,
all channels are of equal value. For PCM the designer can adjust
the primary channels to have more resolution than say the gear channel.
This makes for a system that can be weighted towards the primary channel
resolution.
Disadvantages - There are several
so I will list them:
IPD
IPD can be considered a mating of
PPM and PCM. While PPM has no valid "frame" or parity bits, IPD does
to a certain extent. Each frame is similar to PCM in that it has
a valid length and data range. But the frame it uses are similar
to PPM. So no header, trailer, parity, failsafe, or other bits are
used. The Rx though does contain an microprocessor that
looks at the data and determines
if it is valid or not. The failsafe positions are kept in the rx,
not the stream of data! So in the end while similar processing that
is done with PCM occurs, the data rate is much higher. Also the famous
lockout does not occur because the IPD programming is to reject bad data
(and use the failsafe position if enough bad data is received) but there
is no pause once a good data packet is obtained. With the higher
refresh rate (smaller packets) and lack of a pause, control is
returned faster. The other
thing that the rx does is to modulate the data rejection parameters.
If a good signal is received, then the next signal is compared on a tighter
data rejection scale. Once a bad packet is received, then the parameters
move the other way. This allows a loosening of the belt once bad
data is obtained yet still allows packet information to be processed.
Advantages - faster refresh rate,
equal value channels (similar to PPM), failsafe, bad data rejection, light
weight (less parts count), compatible with ANY PPM system, adjustable packet
parameters.
BTW - the "slow" response that IPD
explanation hints at is once again a mating of PCM and PPM. For example,
when getting to the edge of range the signal will get a lot of bad data
packets. Since the system is designed to reject bad data and use
good ones, the model's response will appear to slow down as the signals
are accepted and rejected. Also as the packet window is widened,
the control response is lessened as well to prevent the dreaded glitch!